North Korea’s move test of China’s waning influence

January 8, 2016 4:20 pm
Beijing under pressure to rein in Kim Jong Un amid strained ties.

 Experts say Beijing’s influence over
Pyongyang has diminished since Kim Jong Un took over as ’s
leader at the end of 2011. File Photo / AP.

North Korea may have explained its announced hydrogen bomb test as a
response to US “hostility”, but experts say it may more accurately
reflect deteriorating relations with .
The question now is
how Beijing will respond: not by abandoning its troublesome ally,
experts agree, but perhaps by supporting further sanctions against it.
Whether that would have any effect is in doubt.
“In a way, this
is a protest against Beijing,” said Bo Zhiyue, director of the New
Zealand Contemporary China Research Centre at Victoria University of
Wellington.
“They are saying: ‘We can do whatever we want. This shows our independence, and we don’t need your approval’.”
Scientists
and officials say the test almost certainly did not involve a hydrogen
bomb. But the fourth test of any kind of nuclear device by the isolated
country would signal its continuing defiance of the outside world –
including China, which has long expressed displeasure with Pyongyang’s
nuclear programme.

Experts say Beijing’s influence over Pyongyang has diminished
since Kim Jong Un took over as North Korea’s leader at the end of 2011
and Xi Jinping became President of China in 2013.
The two men have not met since assuming power, with Xi even snubbing his counterpart by visiting South Korea first in 2014.
In
October, there was talk of a thaw when Xi sent an envoy to attend a
military parade in Pyongyang with a signed letter carrying the Chinese
President’s “best wishes” to Kim. But relations swiftly turned frigid
again in December, after Kim declared that his country had developed a
hydrogen bomb.
Xuan Dongri, director of Northeast Studies at
Yanbian University, said: “China and North Korea’s understanding of
each other is deteriorating further.”
Bo said a key problem has
been the centralisation of power in Beijing under Xi. Instead of the
multifaceted policy towards North Korea that prevailed under Xi’s
predecessor, Hu Jintao, with some senior leaders advocating engagement
and others taking a harder line, Xi is calling all the shots.
Since
Xi has not met Kim and has his hands full with policy challenges, there
is little meaningful dialogue taking place and little internal debate
on how best to influence Pyongyang. “You need to have a connection if
you want to convince or persuade the other side. If you don’t have a
connection, where is the leverage?”
Bo said Xi was “caught in a
dilemma”, reluctant to hew closer to the US approach of isolating and
punishing North Korea but “powerless” to prevent North Korea’s nuclear
programme.
Analysts are not predicting a complete breakdown in
Sino-North Korean ties. Nor do they foresee North Korea abandoning the
nuclear programme that has become a key pillar of its regime’s declared
legitimacy, at least not soon.
“Beijing will face increased
pressure both domestically and internationally to punish and rein in Kim
Jong Un,” said Yanmei Xie, senior China analyst with the International
Crisis Group in Beijing. “But there is likely to be a repeat of the worn
playbook of denunciation, tightening of sanctions and calling for
resurrection of the six-party talks.”
China is North Korea’s largest trading partner. It has been unwilling to pull the plug for fear of toppling the Kim regime.
Paul
Haenle of the Carnegie-Tsinghua Centre in Beijing said China is likely
to move cautiously, but he did not rule out a tougher line.
“North
Korea’s defiance is not only an untenable burden on China’s image as a
credible and strong leader on this issue, but will also lead to an
enhanced US security posture in the region and increased cooperation
between the US and its Asia-Pacific allies – not something Beijing
wants.”
“While analysts have plenty of evidence to justify their
assessments that China won’t change course, I think we need to be open
to the possibility that China could respond differently this time.”
How to tell if it’s a nuke:
Seismology:
There are hundreds of sensors around the world designed to pick up the
seismic activity associated with nuclear weapons. Nukes set off
underground create vibration patterns that can be easily distinguished
from earthquakes, drilling or other activity. Sensors are good at
pinpointing the location of a nuclear test.
Atmospheric sampling:
One of the telltale signs is radiation. If the testers are trying to
cover their tracks, there may not be large pieces of radioactive
evidence. But there may be gases that can seep through earth and rock.
So watchdogs will “sniff” the atmosphere for xenon, which doesn’t bind
easily to other elements and makes it easier to link to a nuclear test.
By analysing wind patterns, experts can find the source of the xenon.
Acoustics:
There’s a network of underwater microphones to listen for
nuclear-related vibrations. Sound travels well underwater: experts can
identify violent disruptions against ordinary ocean noise.
What we know:North
Korea claims to have blown up an H-bomb; scientists detected a
4.9-magnitude seismic event; Japan and the US are sending jets to sniff
for radioactive isotopes. Investigators may not find any xenon gases to
speak of, as was the case after North Korea’s test in 2009. In 2013,
researchers could only pick up inconclusive amounts.

Tags:
shared on wplocker.com