Federal Judge rejects sex allegations against Prince Andrew, lawyer

April 8, 2015 4:23 pm

A federal judge rejected a bid by two women to join a high-profile
sexual abuse lawsuit and ordered scandalous sex allegations against
Britain’s and a prominent U.S. lawyer removed from the
court record.

The Duke of York with his accuser, Virginia Roberts. Photo / supplied

U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra’s ruling came in a
case involving wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein. The two women,
identified as Jane Does No. 3 and No. 4, claim to be among dozens of
women Epstein sexually abused as teenagers at locations ranging from a
Palm Beach mansion to a private Caribbean island to a sprawling New
Mexico ranch.

The women wanted to join a lawsuit filed by other
alleged victims. The lawsuit against the U.S. government seeks to reopen
a non-prosecution agreement Epstein reached with federal prosecutors.
Epstein pleaded guilty more than six years ago to state sex offenses and
served a 13-month jail sentence, but could have gotten a much longer
prison term if the Justice Department had brought charges.

Federal prosecutors opposed allowing the two Jane Does to join the lawsuit, which was filed in 2008, and Marra agreed.
“Justice does not require amendment in this instance,” the judge wrote.

A federal judge rejected a bid by two women to join a high-profile sexual abuse lawsuit against Britain's Prince Andrew and a prominent U.S. lawyer. Photo / Getty
A federal judge rejected a bid by two women
to join a high-profile sexual abuse lawsuit against Britain’s Prince
Andrew and a prominent U.S. lawyer. Photo / Getty
Marra also ordered sensational allegations against Prince
Andrew and well-known lawyer Alan Dershowitz, a former Harvard Law
School professor, stricken from the court record. Both denied any
wrongdoing, with Dershowitz contending in his own court filings that
Jane Doe No. 3 made up sex abuse stories involving him. Buckingham
Palace stood by Prince Andrew, the second son of Queen Elizabeth II who
is also known as the Duke of York.
Marra said the sex abuse details had no bearing on the lawsuit’s goal of reopening the Epstein non-prosecution agreement.
factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in
sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim,”
the judge wrote. “These unnecessary details shall be stricken.”
Palace had no comment Tuesday, referring to its past denials.
Dershowitz, in a statement, called the decision “a vindication of my
position” and said it should serve as a warning to attorneys against
making unsupported allegations.
Miami attorney David O. Markus, a former Dershowitz student and close friend, said Marra made the right decision.
Marra saw through all the noise and correctly found that this is a
court of law, not a tabloid which prints first and looks for evidence
later. These absurd allegations have no place in our legal system,”
Markus, who is not involved in the case, said in an email.
Edwards, an attorney for the Jane Does, said the women could still
participate in the case later and that the sex abuse allegations may
surface again as evidence. Marra’s did not rule on whether the claims
were true or false, or if they may be admissible in the future.
“We look forward to those later stages,” Edwards said.
lawsuit, filed by two other Jane Doe victims, claims federal
prosecutors improperly concealed the Epstein non-prosecution agreement,
violating federal victims’ rights laws. If it is reopened, Epstein could
be exposed anew to federal prosecution and the U.S. government could be
forced to pay the women damages.
Epstein has already reached out-of-court financial settlements with dozens of the victims.

shared on wplocker.com